Paul Weiss - Blackjack!
Download the PDF of this article here >>
17th June 2024
Written by Scott Gibson and Sloane Poulton
With two more London partner hires announced in the past two months, by our reckoning, Paul Weiss – the City’s Big Law equivalent of an exploding super nova – has hired no fewer than 21 partners to its Air Street office since its fiery European re-birth in August last year (this excludes a couple of partners who will be splitting their time between London and elsewhere, and two internal promotions in June).
The impact of the covetous New Yorker on the highest levels of the London legal services market over such a short period has been profound; certainly, greater than any previous law firm launch or re-launch this city has ever seen. Whether it be: re-calibrating expectations with (reportedly) $20 million headline compensation for its favoured laterals; the huge knock-on effect down the chain as hapless rivals have scrambled to re-stock anchor rainmakers; or (ultimately the most important metric of all) instructions on significant European mandates - Paul Weiss has proved the adage “there is always room at the top!”
It is probable that the only reason the New York firm has even been able to make vertical hires, not to mention rapid internal partner promotions, is because of the recent abandonment of its, once sacrosanct, all-equity partnership structure.
Significantly, the Wall Street firm’s two most recent hires – a Counsel from Linklaters and a Senior Associate from Clifford Chance – are its first ever “vertical” (non-partner into partnership) recruits as opposed to “lateral” (partner-to-partner) hires in London. Whilst vertical hires are not exactly cheating – indeed, some of the most successful rainmakers in the City originally got their big break as vertical
hires - the carrot of “day-one partnership” sure makes luring top (non-partner) talent a whole lot easier. It’s a template snatched from the playbook of arch-rival Kirkland & Ellis and used to phenomenal success in that firm’s more than decade-long rapid expansion.
It is probable that the only reason the New York firm has even been able to make vertical hires, not to mention rapid internal partner promotions, is because of the recent abandonment of its, once sacrosanct, all-equity partnership structure. Whilst all-equity partnerships convey many advantages to elite law firms, they are structurally inflexible and, due to the high bar to entry, make rapid partner expansion exponentially more problematic (not to mention eye wateringly expensive!)
So having already elbowed its way into a prime seat at London’s Big Law top table by removing all house limits, it seems the New York Patrician can keep playing into the small hours by either doubling down for the odd lateral “whale” or, with its new-found ability to make smaller (less risky) bets, patiently accumulate chips bit-by-bit at the expense of its rivals for whom the Blackjack term “HIT ME!” may have whole different connotations.
©Edwards Gibson
Download the PDF of this article here >>
-
Paul Weiss - The invasive species that upset the London Big Law ecosystem
-
Paul Weiss - Happy Birthday to BigLaw's Apex Predator
-
Paul Weiss - Blackjack!
-
Breaking The Circle - the real significance of Freshfields pay bonanza is far more profound than just another Big Law salary arms race.
-
A lawyer's progress to partnership... and the closing window of opportunity
-
Linklaters – Welcome to the “Hotel California” of Big Law; “You can check out anytime you like but you can never leave”
-
The Pecking Order at MIPIM; believe it or not Real Estate Lawyers are not at the bottom!
-
Parallels in Peril, two midsize law firms – Axiom Ince and Stroock & Stroock & Lavan – collapse in the same month
-
And you thought $20 million was a lot for a lawyer…
-
Legal Upheaval: Kirkland & Ellis and Paul Weiss Exchange Blows
-
So, it’s A&O Shearman!
-
Real Estate lawyers - beware the £1,000 fish, and the true meaning of MIPIM … (literally)
-
Previous Issues of Partner Moves
-
Edwards Gibson Methodology for Compiling Partner Moves
-
Quantifying your following and writing an effective law firm business plan
-
Sample law firm business plan
-
The Partnership Track and Moving for Immediate Partnership
-
Legal directory rankings and their effect on lawyer recruitment
-
Restrictive Covenants and Moving on as a Partner
-
Competency Based Interviews - an overview
-
Verbal reasoning tests
-
Recruiting in-house lawyers - a guide for General Counsel/Legal Directors
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2014-15
-
Compensation Packages for Expat US Lawyers in London – ‘COLAs’ Explained
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2013-14
-
The In-House Triumph over Law Firms - A Pyrrhic victory?
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2012-13
-
London Law Firm Partner Compensation 2012-13
-
The rise and fall of the elite investment bank lawyer
-
Attracting and retaining top talent to an in-house legal department
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2011-12
-
FAQs about legal recruiting
-
The successful business lawyer
-
How to be the model candidate....
-
Moving from In-house to Private Practice
-
Moving in-house
-
Using social networking sites to generate business
-
Starting out on the track to partnership
-
Flexible working in law firms
-
Law firms using social networking sites to vet candidates
-
The importance of the law firm-recruiter relationship explained
-
Choosing a legal recruiter
-
Dealing with a counter-offer